Editing Round 9/Rulings (section)

== Ruling 6 ==

;2021-03-03 | Wotton
: I humbly request a ruling on the following: <pre>One does not need to explicitly mention that they are spending a quack when performing an action that moves a named duck to a different pond.</pre>
: waddle

;Ruling | Judge Random Internet Cat
: I issue the following response: "False".
 <blockquote>
 Players may move ducks from one pond to another by spending one quack from that duck and posting in #game-actions.
 </blockquote>
: The action of spending one quack is not given explicitly given any method, but it is described as performable (at least in the context of moving a duck) in the above sentence. It is therefore a default-method action and can be performed by posting in #game-actions (with a duck word). Since no other method is provided to expend a quack, I find that it must be explicitly stated in #game-actions to be performed.

: quack