SPICE:Judges - Revision history

RandomNetCat: 4 revisions imported: Import Miraheze archive 2022-10-29

2022-11-25T02:09:25Z

4 revisions imported: Import Miraheze archive 2022-10-29

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:09, 25 November 2022
(No difference)

miraheze>Randomnetcat: Changes during pre-Cycle 13 review

2022-09-29T01:30:30Z

Changes during pre-Cycle 13 review

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:30, 29 September 2022
Line 2:		Line 2:
	{		{

	There shall be a sole Judge, responsible for resolving rules disputes~~. If there is no Judge, any player can appoint themself Judge with the assent of two other players~~. An incumbent Judge can be removed with the assent of two players, but they should not be removed except for abuse of office. A person can cease being the Judge by publicly stating so.		There shall be a sole Judge, responsible for resolving rules disputes. An incumbent Judge can be removed with the assent of two players, but they should not be removed except for abuse of office. A person can cease being the Judge by publicly stating so.

	A request for justice shall take the form of a question or statement. The proper response to a question is an answer to that question, and the proper response to a statement is the truth value of that statement.		A request for justice shall take the form of a question or statement. The proper response to a question is an answer to that question, and the proper response to a statement is the truth value of that statement.

	Upon formal request by a person other than themself, the Judge shall, as quickly as possible, issue a response to the request. This response shall be binding only to the extent that it reasonably directly pertains to the request, and only to the extent that it does not blatantly and obviously contradict rules text.		Upon formal submission of a request for justice by a person other than themself in #request-for-justice, the Judge shall, as quickly as possible, issue a response to the request. This response shall be binding only to the extent that it reasonably directly pertains to the request, and only to the extent that it does not blatantly and obviously contradict rules text.

	~~Judges~~ may ~~make rulings~~ on ~~the Metaruleset~~, ~~but those rulings shall only be effective within~~ the ~~bounds~~ of ~~the round~~.		Within 4 days of a judge issuing a ruling, a public vote of confidence on that ruling can be initiated in #request-for-justice. Votes may be cast in such a vote for a period of 2 days after initiation. Votes are to be cast by :+1: or :-1: reactions on a clearly designated poll message; if a person's vote is unclear, it is to affirm the judgement. A ruling is overturned if strictly more players vote in favor of overturning than affirming.

	A ~~judge~~ ruling ~~can~~ be overturned within ~~4 days~~ of being made ~~by initiating~~ a ~~public vote of confidence~~ in ~~#game-actions;~~ the ~~votes may be cast for~~ a ~~period of 2 days after initiation. A~~ ruling ~~is overturned if strictly more players vote~~ in ~~favor of overturning than affirming~~. An overturned ruling shall have no bearing on the interpretation of the rules or of the gamestate.		A ruling may be overturned by the Judge who made it within one week of being made. When a ruling is overturned in this manner, the Judge shall then issue a new ruling on the initial request, which shall be binding in the same manner as the original ruling.

			An overturned ruling shall have no bearing on the interpretation of the rules or of the gamestate.

			Any reputable player may become a candidate for the Judge by sending a message in the channel #judge-elections. If there are any Judge candidacies put forward during a week, the player whose message is both popular and has the most :+1: reactions becomes the Judge once that week ends. A Judge Candidacy message is popular if it has more :+1: than :-1: reactions on its initiating message. Ties are broken in favor of the player with the earliest text message during that week.

	}</pre>		}</pre>

2605:A601:A637:6900:F864:D00D:7899:C95: Clarify votes of confidence

2021-02-25T21:05:15Z

Clarify votes of confidence

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:05, 25 February 2021
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Judges may make rulings on the Metaruleset, but those rulings shall only be effective within the bounds of the round.		Judges may make rulings on the Metaruleset, but those rulings shall only be effective within the bounds of the round.

	~~Judge rulings~~ can be overturned within 4 days of being made by a public vote of confidence; ~~they are~~ overturned if strictly more players vote in favor of overturning than affirming. An overturned ruling shall have no bearing on the interpretation of the rules or of the gamestate.		A judge ruling can be overturned within 4 days of being made by initiating a public vote of confidence in #game-actions; the votes may be cast for a period of 2 days after initiation. A ruling is overturned if strictly more players vote in favor of overturning than affirming. An overturned ruling shall have no bearing on the interpretation of the rules or of the gamestate.

	}</pre>		}</pre>

miraheze>Randomnetcat: Properly format

2021-02-09T18:13:09Z

Properly format

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:13, 9 February 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<~~nowiki~~>Enact a rule entitled Judges:		<pre>Enact a rule entitled Judges:
	{		{

Line 12:		Line 12:
	Judge rulings can be overturned within 4 days of being made by a public vote of confidence; they are overturned if strictly more players vote in favor of overturning than affirming. An overturned ruling shall have no bearing on the interpretation of the rules or of the gamestate.		Judge rulings can be overturned within 4 days of being made by a public vote of confidence; they are overturned if strictly more players vote in favor of overturning than affirming. An overturned ruling shall have no bearing on the interpretation of the rules or of the gamestate.

	}</~~nowiki~~>		}</pre>

miraheze>Randomnetcat: Add initial version

2021-02-09T18:11:45Z

Add initial version

New page

<nowiki>Enact a rule entitled Judges:
{

There shall be a sole Judge, responsible for resolving rules disputes. If there is no Judge, any player can appoint themself Judge with the assent of two other players. An incumbent Judge can be removed with the assent of two players, but they should not be removed except for abuse of office. A person can cease being the Judge by publicly stating so.

A request for justice shall take the form of a question or statement. The proper response to a question is an answer to that question, and the proper response to a statement is the truth value of that statement.

Upon formal request by a person other than themself, the Judge shall, as quickly as possible, issue a response to the request. This response shall be binding only to the extent that it reasonably directly pertains to the request, and only to the extent that it does not blatantly and obviously contradict rules text.

Judges may make rulings on the Metaruleset, but those rulings shall only be effective within the bounds of the round.

Judge rulings can be overturned within 4 days of being made by a public vote of confidence; they are overturned if strictly more players vote in favor of overturning than affirming. An overturned ruling shall have no bearing on the interpretation of the rules or of the gamestate.

}</nowiki>