Round 9/Rulings: Difference between revisions

Line 205:

;Ruling | Judge Random Internet Cat

: ~~Awaiting Judgement~~

: Response: "yes".

Once per voting period, a player may feed another player’s duck by announcing which duck they with to feed in #game-actions

</blockquote>

: The standard here is (implicitly) to "specify" the duck. I find that the given name is similar enough to the true name (without there being any other names it could reasonably be) for the duck to be specified.

== Ruling 20 ==

Line 214:

Line 218:

;Ruling | Judge Random Internet Cat

: Response: "yes". I found, however, that such an action would have no effect. Quacks are items, and it does not make sense to "deduct" negative items, nor does it make sense to "transfer" negative items.

== Ruling 21 ==

;2021-03-22 | JumbleTheCircle!

: RfJ: If someone changed their name to a duck name, would the "names impersonating players" clause then delete that duck name?

;Ruling | Judge Random Internet Cat

: Response: "yes".

== Ruling 22 ==

;2021-03-23 | belCavendishNY

: i request justice on the following statement: i have fed a duck this voting period, as of the time of this message

;Ruling | Judge Random Internet Cat

: Reponse: "no". The only possible feeding hadn't yet been completed because no die was rolled.

== Ruling 23 ==

;2021-03-23 | Klink can't read

: I request justice on the following statement: my duck named The Duck Disciple cannot be the target of the Ritual Quack Attack listed under the rule Duck God subrule Duck Disciple.

;Ruling | Judge Random Internet Cat | OVERTURNED

: Response: "true". The Duck Disciple, as defined in the rules, is a specific entity and references to the Duck Disciple in the rules cannot be supplanted by a named duck.

;Ruling | Judge Random Internet Cat

: Amended response: "false" for the same reasons as above.

@@ Line 205: / Line 205: @@
 ;Ruling | Judge Random Internet Cat
-: Awaiting Judgement
+: Response: "yes".
+ <blockquote>
+ Once per voting period, a player may feed another player’s duck by announcing which duck they with to feed in #game-actions
+ </blockquote>
+: The standard here is (implicitly) to "specify" the duck. I find that the given name is similar enough to the true name (without there being any other names it could reasonably be) for the duck to be specified.
 == Ruling 20 ==
@@ Line 214: / Line 218: @@
 ;Ruling | Judge Random Internet Cat
 : Response: "yes". I found, however, that such an action would have no effect. Quacks are items, and it does not make sense to "deduct" negative items, nor does it make sense to "transfer" negative items.
+== Ruling 21 ==
+;2021-03-22 | JumbleTheCircle!
+: RfJ: If someone changed their name to a duck name, would the "names impersonating players" clause then delete that duck name?
+;Ruling | Judge Random Internet Cat
+: Response: "yes".
+== Ruling 22 ==
+;2021-03-23 | belCavendishNY
+: i request justice on the following statement: i have fed a duck this voting period, as of the time of this message
+;Ruling | Judge Random Internet Cat
+: Reponse: "no". The only possible feeding hadn't yet been completed because no die was rolled.
+== Ruling 23 ==
+;2021-03-23 | Klink can't read
+: I request justice on the following statement: my duck named The Duck Disciple cannot be the target of the Ritual Quack Attack listed under the rule Duck God subrule Duck Disciple.
+;Ruling | Judge Random Internet Cat | OVERTURNED
+: Response: "true". The Duck Disciple, as defined in the rules, is a specific entity and references to the Duck Disciple in the rules cannot be supplanted by a named duck.
+;Ruling | Judge Random Internet Cat
+: Amended response: "false" for the same reasons as above.