Cycle 13/Ruleset Draft: Difference between revisions
miraheze>CodeTriangle start the drafting |
miraheze>Randomnetcat Add judges |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
== [P] Winning == | == [P] Winning == | ||
The player or players with the most [P] Orbs at the end of the Cycle wins. | The player or players with the most [P] Orbs at the end of the Cycle wins. | ||
== [P] Judges == | |||
There shall be a sole Judge, responsible for resolving rules disputes. An incumbent Judge can be removed with the assent of two players, but they should not be removed except for abuse of office. A person can cease being the Judge by publicly stating so. | |||
A request for justice shall take the form of a question or statement. The proper response to a question is an answer to that question, and the proper response to a statement is the truth value of that statement. | |||
Upon formal submission of a request for justice by a person other than themself in #request-for-justice, the Judge shall, as quickly as possible, issue a response to the request. This response shall be binding only to the extent that it reasonably directly pertains to the request, and only to the extent that it does not blatantly and obviously contradict rules text. | |||
Within 4 days of a judge issuing a ruling, a public vote of confidence on that ruling can be initiated in #request-for-justice. Votes may be cast in such a vote for a period of 2 days after initiation. Votes are to be cast by :+1: or :-1: reactions on a clearly designated poll message; if a person's vote is unclear, it is to affirm the judgement. A ruling is overturned if strictly more players vote in favor of overturning than affirming. | |||
A ruling may be overturned by the Judge who made it within one week of being made. When a ruling is overturned in this manner, the Judge shall then issue a new ruling on the initial request, which shall be binding in the same manner as the original ruling. | |||
An overturned ruling shall have no bearing on the interpretation of the rules or of the gamestate. | |||
Any reputable player may become a candidate for the Judge by sending a message in the channel #judge-elections. If there are any Judge candidacies put forward during a week, the player whose message is both popular and has the most :+1: reactions becomes the Judge once that week ends. A Judge Candidacy message is popular if it has more :+1: than :-1: reactions on its initiating message. Ties are broken in favor of the player with the earliest text message during that week. | |||
Revision as of 01:27, 29 September 2022
The main idea is that there is that every [period of time] things get reset. My intention is for Leaderboards to be the primary method of gaining important permanent materials (such as Orbs) and to be a method of gaining useful non-permanent items for the next loop, but I am not a majority of players.
[P] Time Loops
Every [period of time], every rule that is not marked [P] is deleted, and all items that are not marked [P] are removed from inventories.
[P] Leaderboards
At the beginning of every [period of time], [number] Goals are randomly selected. Each Goal is randomly given a reward from the list of rewards.
At the end of a [period of time] the players that best accomplished a Goal that was selected at he beginning of the [period of time] get the reward selected for that Goal. This occurs after inventory wipes occur.
Goal list
Have the most Coins at the end of the [period of time].
Reward list
[P] Orb (1-5)
[P] Items
Items are entities that players can have in their inventory.
While all items are wiped after the ends of [periods of time], the definitions of items stay.
Item list
[P] Orb
Coin
[P]roposals
A player may propose a change or set of changes to the ruleset by sending them in #proposals. New rules in proposals must have a title and may be marked [P] or not marked [P].
[P] Winning
The player or players with the most [P] Orbs at the end of the Cycle wins.
[P] Judges
There shall be a sole Judge, responsible for resolving rules disputes. An incumbent Judge can be removed with the assent of two players, but they should not be removed except for abuse of office. A person can cease being the Judge by publicly stating so.
A request for justice shall take the form of a question or statement. The proper response to a question is an answer to that question, and the proper response to a statement is the truth value of that statement.
Upon formal submission of a request for justice by a person other than themself in #request-for-justice, the Judge shall, as quickly as possible, issue a response to the request. This response shall be binding only to the extent that it reasonably directly pertains to the request, and only to the extent that it does not blatantly and obviously contradict rules text.
Within 4 days of a judge issuing a ruling, a public vote of confidence on that ruling can be initiated in #request-for-justice. Votes may be cast in such a vote for a period of 2 days after initiation. Votes are to be cast by :+1: or :-1: reactions on a clearly designated poll message; if a person's vote is unclear, it is to affirm the judgement. A ruling is overturned if strictly more players vote in favor of overturning than affirming.
A ruling may be overturned by the Judge who made it within one week of being made. When a ruling is overturned in this manner, the Judge shall then issue a new ruling on the initial request, which shall be binding in the same manner as the original ruling.
An overturned ruling shall have no bearing on the interpretation of the rules or of the gamestate.
Any reputable player may become a candidate for the Judge by sending a message in the channel #judge-elections. If there are any Judge candidacies put forward during a week, the player whose message is both popular and has the most :+1: reactions becomes the Judge once that week ends. A Judge Candidacy message is popular if it has more :+1: than :-1: reactions on its initiating message. Ties are broken in favor of the player with the earliest text message during that week.